|
December 23, 2009 on 12:49 pm | In Airline News, Travel Hints | No Comments
Due to the building midestern winter storm that is already gaining strength, airlines are, once again, waiving change fees to diminish the impact of looming cancellations and delays.
For a list of airlines and details on their current policies, visit USA Today’s Today in the Sky blog HERE.
If you have any flexibility at all, consider attempting to depart on your flight early or, perhaps, re-routing yourself through a connection in a city likely to be unaffected by the weather. Considering the current weather picture and current forecast, hub cities such as DFW, Houston, Atlanta, Phoenix, and Denver.
Hub cities such as Denver, Chicago, Minneapolis, Detroit, Cincinatti, and Cleveland are all likely to be affected at least somewhat by the looming weather over the next few days. Based on that, airlines likely to be most affected might be Delta / Northwest Airlines (Minneapolis, Detroit), United Airlines (Chicago and Denver), American Airlines (Chicago), Airtran (Milwaukee), Southwest (Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Colorado, Michigan), and Continental (Cleveland).
Hint: If you are a member of a frequent flier program, see if there is a dedicated phone number you can call.
Hint: Make sure your cellular phone is charged and you have your charger in your carry on luggage.
Hint: If you have a laptop computer, consider traveling with it in your carry on luggage.
Hint: If you are seeking to re-route yourself, explore options among codeshare partners with your airline when speaking to a reservations agent.
Hint: If you must board and travel on a flight in a city being affected by the storm, purchase some snacks and water in the terminal to take on the aircraft with you.
You can review all travel hints by clicking HERE.
Filed under: Airline News, Travel Hints by ajax
No Comments »
December 18, 2009 on 1:00 am | In Airline News | No Comments
Before anything else, I’d like to announce that this is my 200th post to this blog. Quite the milestone all in all.
USA Today’s Today in the Sky Blog is reporting that several airlines have removed their advance purchase requirement for bargain fares this holiday season. Their source, Tom Parsons (CEO of BestFares.com), says that airlines such as American Airlines, Delta, United, Northwest, US Airways, Frontier, Airtran and Midwest have all removed the advance purchase requirement through January 4th. Continental still has a 3-day advance purchase requirement. This would seem to imply that holiday travel is extremely soft this season so far.
Filed under: Airline News by ajax
No Comments »
December 3, 2009 on 1:01 pm | In Aircraft Development, Airline Fleets | No Comments
That isn’t a big surprise to most readers of this blog and one very good reason why I’ve said little about the event. Despite the long program delays and disappointing news of certain developments about this aircraft, I remain extremely excited about this aircraft. Perhaps for different reasons than most, though.
Mainstream press continues to speak about the 787’s increased comfort potential for the passenger and sometimes mentions the efficiency the aircraft will offer airlines. All that is true but it excites me for different and more specific reasons.
First and foremost, it is the first truly new aircraft to come from Boeing since the 777 made it’s first flight in 1994. Since then, there have been improved variants of the 737, 767 and 777 introduced but this is the first “from scratch” aircraft to show up in 15 years from Boeing. That is exciting to me.
One of the most disappointing results from the Boeing / McDonnell Douglas merger is that, in many respects, Boeing was taken over by McDonnell Douglas managers rather than the other way around despite the fact that, for all intents and purposes, it was really a Boeing takeover of McDonnell Douglas. Since that merger, Boeing has been much more intently focused on developing its defense businesses almost at the expense of investing in Boeing Commercial Aircraft. That has been disappointing and a bit perplexing to me given Boeing’s ability to build fantastic aircraft for the commercial world.
So I hope that this aircraft, the 787, represents a return to innovation and development for Boeing Commercial Aircraft. I hope that a new, younger group of managers is being born from this program that will lead Boeing’s development of new aircraft such as a 737 replacement, a 757/767 replacement and, yes, a new 777/747 replacement too. But I remain concerned if for no other reason than Boeing seems to be ignoring new competition from Bombardier and EMBRAER who are now challenging the 100 to 130 seat domestic segment in the US and elsewhere. If Bombardier can build its new C-Series aircraft with union labor in Canada, Boeing should be more than capable of developing a new family of aircraft to compete against those two companies.
While the first flight is truly on track to happen in the next two weeks, the burning anticipation of that first flight has, if anything, died down in many respects. Those who have followed it tortuous path to first flight recognize that it isn’t the first flight that means anything now. The aircraft is so mature in its development that we know it will not only fly but fly very successfully. We know that the major teething problems are almost certainly over now. There isn’t any need to speculate on its performance on a first flight and really nothing to wonder about for its testing over the next 12 months.
The real anticipation comes from seeing it perform with an airline. We want to see it enter an airline’s fleet and see how it performs during real world use. We want to see if airline CEOs proclaim it the game changer we all ferverently hope it is. We even just want to see what the airlines’ liveries will really look like on it. The real next “moment of truth” for the 787 is when it enters a fleet in its new livery. The launch customer is All Nippon Airways (ANA) and we should see ANA put the 787 into service sometime in late 2010.
The 787 should see service with a US airline in late 2010 or early 2011 and it will be Delta Airlines who has the honor by virtue of inheriting Northwest Airlines’ orders. I suspect we’ll see Delta order more shortly after the 787 begins operating in its fleet. Continental Airlines will put the 787 into service a short while later.
This is the most anticipated large volume aircraft to be designed and built since the 1960’s. That’s exciting.
What’s also exciting is what this aircraft means to Boeing and its future development projects. Will these same technologies be used on a 737/757 replacement? Is it conceivable that they’ll be used for a Very Large Aircraft to replace the 777? Both are possibilities. Detractors say there isn’t as much “gain” to be had in using carbon fibre based fuselages for a 737 replacement with respect to efficiency and that is probably true.
However, these new techologies may mean that Boeing can produce the 737 replacement even faster. The composite carbon fibre fuselages may mean less maintenance and longer maintenance intervals for airlines like Southwest and Ryanair. The new engines coming into development will demand some changes too. Larger by-pass ratio engines or, if developed, open rotor engines means more clearance will be needed between the wing and the ground. The next aircraft will have to stand taller and that might mean a little more time spent on ground handling.
The next generation engines and Boeing decision to produce an “electric” airliner may see those approaches used in the 737 replacement. Have we reached a point in reliability that we can expect these new systems to survive the punishing schedules of a domestic airline? I think so but the 787 is the aircraft that must support that supposition.
The 787 won’t be exciting because of what it potentially offers the customer in comforts. Yes, no matter what we’ll have larger windows and a little bit more fresh air and pressurization in the cabin but if you think you’ll be getting more spacious seat pitch, you’ll be disappointed. This new aircraft will be as packed as any in service now. Overhead bins will still be crowded.
My birthday is December 12th. There is speculation that the 787 may fly as early as December 14th. That’s close enough that I find myself kind of hoping that Boeing might pull a fast one and send it up into the sky 2 days early. It would be exciting to have an airliner born on my birthdate.
Filed under: Aircraft Development, Airline Fleets by ajax
No Comments »
October 27, 2009 on 4:31 pm | In Airline News | 1 Comment
Northwest Airlines pilots have their flying privileges revoked by the FAA.
The FAA has revoked the pilots’ certificates immediately. They now have 10 days to appeal this emergency action (and no doubt will.)
More from the Dallas Morning News HERE.
Filed under: Airline News by ajax
1 Comment »
October 22, 2009 on 4:35 pm | In Airline News, Airports | 1 Comment
I have a funny feeling that safety and getting those Delta/Northwest ops combined is about to become a big focus at the airline.
Incident 1: NTSB INVESTIGATING LANDING OF COMMERCIAL JETLINER ON TAXIWAY IN ATLANTA
——————————————————————————–
The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating the landing of a Delta B-767 on an active taxiway at Atlanta Hartsfield International Airport (ATL).
According to preliminary information received from several sources, on Monday, October 19, 2009, at 6:05 a.m. EDT, a Boeing B767-332ER (N185DN) operating as Delta Air Lines flight 60 from Rio de Janeiro to Atlanta landed on taxiway M at ATL after being cleared to land on runway 27R. No injuries to any of the 182 passengers or 11 crewmembers were reported.
A check airman was on the flight deck along with the captain and first officer. During cruise flight, the check airman became ill and was relocated to the cabin for the remainder of the flight. A medical emergency was declared and the company was notified by the crew. A determination was made to land at the scheduled destination of ATL.
The flight was cleared to land on runway 27R but instead landed on taxiway M, which is situated immediately to the north and parallel to runway 27R. The runway lights for 27R were illuminated; the localizer and approach lights for 27R were not turned on. Taxiway M was active but was clear of aircraft and ground vehicles at the time the aircraft landed. The wind was calm with 10 miles visibility. Night/dark conditions prevailed; twilight conditions began at about 7:20 a.m. EDT and the official sunrise was at 7:46 a.m. EDT.
A team of four from the NTSB, led by David Helson, is investigating the incident.
The issue of runway safety has been on the NTSB’s Most Wanted List of Safety Improvements since its inception in 1990. Information on the NTSB’s work on runway safety is available at http://www.ntsb.gov/Recs/mostwanted/runways.htm
Incident 2: NTSB INVESTIGATING FLIGHT THAT OVERFLEW INTENDED MINNEAPOLIS AIRPORT
——————————————————————————–
The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating an incident where an Airbus A320 overflew the Minneapolis-St Paul International/Wold-Chamberlain Airport (MSP).
On Wednesday, October 21, 2009, at 5:56 pm mountain daylight time, an Airbus A320, N03274, operating as Northwest Airlines (NWA) flight 188, became a NORDO (no radio communications) flight at 37,000 feet. The flight was operating as a Part 121 flight from San Diego International Airport, San Diego, California (SAN) to MSP with 147 passengers and unknown number of crew.
At 7:58 pm central daylight time (CDT), the aircraft flew over the destination airport and continued northeast for approximately 150 miles. The MSP center controller reestablished communications with the crew at 8:14 pm and reportedly stated that the crew had become distracted and had overflown MSP, and requested to return to MSP.
According to the Federal Administration (FAA) the crew was interviewed by the FBI and airport police. The crew stated they were in a heated discussion over airline policy and they lost situational awareness. The Safety Board is scheduling an interview with the crew.
The cockpit voice recorder (CVR) and flight data recorder (FDR) have been secured and are being sent to the NTSB laboratory in Washington, DC.
David Lawrence, the Investigator-in-Charge, is leading the team of 3 in investigating the incident.
Parties to the investigation are the FAA and Northwest Airlines.
It would appear that pilots at the combined companies are allowing themselves to be a bit distracted these days. I particularly hope that the CVR transcripts for that second incident become available one day. Something tells me that policy talk wasn’t the problem.
Filed under: Airline News, Airports by ajax
1 Comment »
April 3, 2009 on 9:00 am | In Airline News, Airline Service | No Comments
The Dallas Morning News Aviation Blog is has a story about Continental reporting exceptionall dramatic declines in unit revenues over the past month. This is, I believe, the third time Continental has reported rapidly declining unit revenues in the past few months.
At first, one might question what is going on in the industry that shows one legacy airline reporting such poor numbers and there seems to be no similar dire reports from other legacy airlines. Indeed, most others are meeting expectations (remember that expectations as domestic industry aren’t that high to begin with right now) and yet Continental seems to be struggling.
After thinking about this for a couple of days, I think I might have realized what is going on here. First, every airline earns its money from different hubs. There are very few overlapping airline hubs in the US. Continental has hubs in Houston, Newark and Cleveland, for instance. American has their major hubs in Dallas and Chicago. Delta has major domestic hubs in Atlanta and Salt Lake City. What this means is that each airline derives a good portion of its revenue in markets where they are dominant and if those markets are doing poorly, they will too.
Now, Continental has Newark and Houston to contend with and both of those areas are large banking and financial centers. Both are suffering a little bit worse than many in this economy and I suspect that business travel has been reduced dramatically in those areas. Business class travelers are downgrading to economy and economy fliers just aren’t getting their trips approved at all.
So far, Chicago and Dallas have weathered this storm a little better than expected and I think both American Airlines and United Airlines are managing to maneuver just enough to continue to meet financial expectations. Atlanta is also doing just a little bit better as is Minnesota which means Delta continues to have maneuvering room. Delta is exposed in Detroit, however. Their subisidiary, Northwest Airlines dominates all of Michigan and industries in that area are being heavily impacted by the economy.
Continental has made its success story from providing excellent service to business travelers. It was (and will be again one day) a successful strategy due to focusing on attracting full fare or near full fare passengers and they focused a lot less on chasing the lowest fare passengers. With economizing being the watchword at every company, I suspect many of the usual passengers are either deferring travel or quite possibly moving it to LCC competitors of Continental.
The key to Continental’s (and other airline suffering this kind of revenue problem) surviving is being able to weather the crisis while maintaining their superior service. That becomes doubly difficult with no end in sight for this economic crisis. However, their management team is extremely capable and very tuned in to the needs of an airline. If there is a team that can manage this event, it is Continental’s.
I continue to watch for signs that United is weakening more financially and, so far, there are very few public hints. This strikes me as odd since United is a bit more exposed than most. They have a generally less fuel efficient fleet, they are subject to more direct competition from both legacy carriers and LCC carriers at more of their hubs and they have what may well be the most acrimonious relationship with their labor of all the legacy carriers. It makes me wonder what, if anything, they might be successfully concealing in their financial health.
American Airlines is reporting numbers that suggest that they are struggling to maintain their cash reserves at this point. They are, however, taking steps to reduce their costs by cutting their fleet numbers and renewing more of their fleet than originally planned. However, they too, have bad relationships with their labor organizations. In fact, every major union at AA is now actively lobbying for the opportunity to move closer to a strike. There is not one word of any agreement on any contract issue and AA’s strategy appears to be delay, delay, delay. At some point, you really do have to come to agreement with your unions and get on with other important management issues of the day.
I think Continental will recapture its regular business traveler as things improve. They do too good a job of taking care of their customers at a competitive price. Other airlines, however, may discover that their customers have found better options. After all, if you are going to be abused, why not be abused for the lowest price possible?
Filed under: Airline News, Airline Service by ajax
No Comments »
March 31, 2009 on 10:16 am | In Airline News | No Comments
The Detroit Free Press reports that the Northwest Airlines logos have been disappearing throughout Detroit Metro Airport this week. Monday, employees began wearing the Delta Airlines uniform as well.
The change at the Detroit hub for Northwest signals that Delta is proceeding according to plan in its merger with Northwest Airlines which was consummated just 5 months ago. There are now 33 Northwest airplanes painted in Delta colors and Delta expects to have more than 250 repainted by the end of 2010.
For the time being, Northwest Airlines remains a wholly owned subsidiary of Delta Airlines until the two airlines’ Certificates of Operations are merged. This typically can take from 1 to 2 years to accomplish at it involves harmonizing a vast amount of policy and procedure when it comes to flight operations and maintenance. So far, Delta has made quick progress with bringing the two operations together on a pace that is notably quicker than that of America West and US Airways.
Filed under: Airline News by ajax
No Comments »
March 8, 2009 on 11:39 am | In Airline News, Airline Service | No Comments
Southwest Airlines started service between Minneapolis / St. Paul and Chicago today according to the Minneapolis / St. Paul StarTribune. The newspaper reports that Southwest managed to kick off the new service with their trademark attention to customers. Passenger Service Agents even managed to get their first customers to sing a song before boarding.
This marks Southwest’s first of several new routes for this year into new markets. New York City (La Guardia) and Boston Logan are the next to receive Southwest routes.
For now, Southwest will be linking MSP to Chicago only but I do foresee them adding routes to other Southwest focus cities such as Denver, St. Louis, Indianapolis or Detroit. Typically, Northwest Airlines fights back against intruders on their mainstay routes but with the takeover by Delta, one wonders if their is enough attention being paid to the new competition versus integrating the operations. Other airlines have entered the Chicago / MSP route and left it months later badly bruised from fare wars instituted by the dominant three legacy carriers at the two airports, Northwest Airlines, United and American Airlines.
Filed under: Airline News, Airline Service by ajax
No Comments »
March 4, 2009 on 4:19 pm | In Airline News | No Comments
Delta has now made it possible to link your Delta SkyMiles account to your Northwest WorldPerks account and use your miles in a combined fashion. What’s more, they’re offering you 500 miles to do it right now. Their message reads:
Link Your SkyMiles and WorldPerks Accounts
When you link your Northwest WorldPerks account with your Delta
SkyMiles account you can combine your miles immediately to redeem for
mileage upgrades, Award Travel, and even shopping. Enjoy the benefits
of both programs, even before they’re fully integrated. Plus, linking
accounts now will enable automatic consolidation of your account
history, including Elite qualification balances, when the programs
merge later this year.
Two simple steps to faster rewards:
1. Validate account numbers and PINs.
You’ll enter both your WorldPerks and your SkyMiles account numbers
and PINs for authentication.
2. Link accounts, transfer miles.
After linking your accounts, you can begin to transfer miles from one
account to the other. You may transfer as many miles as you want in
either direction–as many times as you want–as long as the miles are
there to transfer.
Or you may choose to only link your accounts and not transfer your
miles at this time. You can return at any time to transfer miles
between accounts.
Link your accounts and transfer your miles before April 15, 2009 and
earn 500 bonus miles in your SkyMiles account. Refer to the terms and
conditions for complete details.
One thing does occur to me: There is probably very little overlap between the two customer bases relatively speaking. Their networks serve different hubs in pretty different geographic locations. No doubt there is some overlap but probably not as much as we might imagine between an AA / United linkup.
Filed under: Airline News by ajax
No Comments »
February 1, 2009 on 1:00 am | In Airplane Spotting | 4 Comments
I got a new Olympus SP550-UZ camera at Christmas time. With 18x optical zoom, it was a huge improvement over my previous camera, an Olympus C2100-UZ. But after testing it out at DFW at the end of December, I realized I needed just a hair more “oomph” and bought an Olympus TCON-17 1.7x teleconverter. That did it.
Plane spotting at DFW is always a bit boring for long stretches because you get to watch American Airlines’ MD-80 and B737 aircraft land all day long with very few other airlines to break things up. On this visit, I managed to catch the AA PinkRibbon Susan G. Komen Embraer RJ once more. I captured a Sun Country Airlines 737, an Airtran 717 and a Lufthansa A340 all taking off or landing on the far runway from Founder’s Plaza. Previously, they would have been a tiny spec in my camera.
I also saw a hawk standing in the field at the foot of the runway watching both us, the spotters, and the aircraft landing. It seemed like it wondered what the big deal was. One of the DFW fire trucks came by on the service road and goosed his fire pump as he went by much to my surprise. I just happened to be taking a photo of him anyway and got the water spraying out although only close up instead of from far away.
The other catch was a China Airlines Cargo B747-400. We visit a secluded area to shoot from that requires us to drive past the air cargo area on the west side of the airport. As we drove by, we saw this huge aircraft parked and pulled over to take photos. While doing so, I noticed it was buttoned up completely and running its APU and figured it would be taking off soon. It did but took nearly an hour to do so.
We also saw three corporate jets take off one after the other. You can see them HERE, HERE and HERE. Both my wife and I had the odd feeling of almost a race the way they took off and quickly turned south by southeast. About 20 minutes later, my wife guessed it. They were the wealthy taking off for Tampa and the Superbowl. I’m sure she is right. They took off so fast that I was only able to get one good photo of each.
Take a look at this PHOTO. The aircraft seems to either be coming straight at me or aimed just to the left of me. In fact, the runway was to the right of me. The crosswinds for that runway (13R-31L) must have been pretty high today.
One final observation. I’ll be sorry to see the Northwest Airlines livery fade away into Delta. Northwest has, in my opinion, one of the handsomest liveries on a US Airliner and it is a shame that Delta isn’t even retaining some small portion of the logo.
You can view all of the photos HERE.
Filed under: Airplane Spotting by ajax
4 Comments »
January 28, 2009 on 11:10 am | In Airline News | 1 Comment
There isn’t any industry shaking news right now. 4th quarter / annual financial results are coming out on a variety of airlines but the news is much what you would expect. Lots of losses, lots of hope for 2009. So, a few things of interest that are going on but aren’t worth a post of their own.
Airtran
Airtran, interestingly enough, posted its first annual loss since 1999. What is remarkable to me is that in 10 horrific years in the airline industry, they made a profit until the end of 2008. That is impressive to me given where they hub from (Atlanta) and who level of competition they experience on almost all of their routes. You can read more HERE in a USA Today / Associated Press story.
United Airlines
United Airlines posted a rather stunning loss of $1.5 billion (with a “B”) for 2008. Those losses are a result of both declining revenue *and* being on the wrong side of a lot of fuel hedges. To a degree, this was already expected. However, UAL’s unrestricted cash reserves have declined to $2 billion (with a “B”) and while that seems like a lot, it really isn’t. Yes, the airline industry is in the dumps right now but at some point sooner than later, United needs to earn some money. Their status quo attitude isn’t helping with that goal.
Virgin Atlantic
The Telegraph newspaper in the UK is carrying THIS rather creative complaint letter from a passenger written to Sir Richard Branson himself. It’s funny and it points out some flaws that should be addressed. If for no other reason than humour, it is worth the time to read it.
Southwest Airlines
Southwest Airlines has announced $49 one-way fares between Chicago and its new destination, Minneapolis / St. Paul. Between Southwest, American Airlines, United Airlines and, most of all, Delta/Northwest Airlines, this is surely going to spark a capacity and fare war between these two cities. There is no doubt in my mind that the legacy airlines will defend their flights on that route to the utmost. Most particularly, Delta/Northwest will likely get downright ugly about it and while Southwest does understand the need to spend time growing a new market, they won’t necessarily try to win by wearing down Delta/Northwest with fare sale after fare sale. If customers don’t embrace Southwest in a reasonable time, that route will get dumped.
Filed under: Airline News by ajax
1 Comment »
January 4, 2009 on 10:00 am | In Airline Fleets, Airline Service, Death Watch | No Comments
And now we come full circle back to the United States and Europe. Both have highly developed, highly competitive airline markets. Each has both LCC type carriers and legacy carriers (and Europe’s legacy carriers are the former national flag carriers in many respects.)
This won’t be a rebuilding year. To the contrary, both markets really need one large airline to be removed from the market. In the case of the United States, I firmly think that should be United Airlines but in Europe that is a harder guess. If I had to pick an large airline in Europe for the surprise of the year, it would be Lufthansa. They are, by all accounts, a great airline but I smell trouble in that group. First, they have been buying into airlines that have been unable to survive on their own. That lack of survival, in many cases, isn’t because of poor management but just a lack of market share being available to them.
Lufthansa has bought SWISS, for instance. I’m not sure why and I’m not sure if they can tell us why. They could have just as easily taken SWISS’ business and left them in a heap. Further, Lufthansa has a lot of Airbus A340 aircraft. Those airplanes just don’t compete on high capacity, long haul routes anymore. What’s more, they also have orders in for the Boeing 747-8, another large capacity, four engine aircraft. Their competitors, Air France/KLM and British Airways, have seen the light in buying more and more Boeing 777 aircraft for their long haul, high capacity routes. It costs less to operate them and they make more money as a consequence. So, going out on a limb here, I say we’ll discover that Lufthansa is nearly insolvent some time by the end of 2009.
Both markets in Europe and the US will continue to face challenges in costs (fuel and more particularly labor) and LCC competition will continue to press air fares downwards. The real solution for large legacy carriers won’t be found this year. Expect more losses (with some exceptions such as SWA and jetBlue) and more merger talk in general.
Here are a few more random predictions:
- United Airlines will ask Glenn Tilton to resign and hire an experienced airline executive. One possibility will be Doug Steenland, most recently Northwest Airlines CEO and now Vice-Chairman of Delta.
- Southwest Airlines will, for the first time, examine adding another aircraft type to their fleet. My guess is it will be the Embraer 170/190 series.
- Airbus will land a major order for aircraft from a traditional Boeing customer in the United States. My bet is that Delta orders more Airbus A330 aircraft.
- China and Japan will drop their regional jet programs or, at the least, defer them for up to 5 years.
- Bombardier will announce a major order (more than 20 aircraft) for the Q400 Turbo-Prop from a US Airline.
- If fuel prices remain steady, Airtran will seek to form a small mid-western hub.
- Last but not least, one LCC type carrier such as jetBlue or Virgin America will attempt to fly to DFW Airport (wishful thinking on my part.)
Happy New Year Everyone.
Filed under: Airline Fleets, Airline Service, Death Watch by ajax
No Comments »
December 19, 2008 on 10:00 am | In Airline News, Airline Service | No Comments
USA Today’s Today in the Sky Blog is reporting that Australian news outlets are now writing about an imminent announcement that Delta will begin flying from Los Angeles to destinations in Australia. Such destinations likely begin with Sydney and add Melbourne and/or Brisbane.
If true, this will mean that Delta will be the first airline to fly regular scheduled routes to all 6 inhabited continents in the world since Pan American Airlines. More important, it means competition for QANTAS, V Australia and United Airlines.
Currently, QANTAS is by far the main leader in that market flying Boeing 747-400 and Airbus A-380 aircraft. It has been said that about 1/5 of their net profit comes from such routes. V Australia, an international arm of Australia’s Virgin Blue, was originally scheduled to begin flying Boeing 777-300ER’s in December but had to slip the start to February 2009 due to Boeing’s labor strike this past fall. United Airlines flies the same routes regularly with 747-400 aircraft that by many accounts are worn and tired and certainly not offering the service options the other two do.
It seems that Delta, if it does fly the route, is planning to use 777-200LR aircraft that are very capable of flying the distances as well as carrying a full load of cargo while doing it. Ironically, the 777 was originally designed with QANTAS in mind although they never ordered any of the aircraft. Indeed, with optional fuel tanks and a light cargo load, it is said that the 777-200LR might be capable of flying from Atlanta to Sydney regularly although it is highly unlikely that this will happen. A more likely choice might be a late build 787-800 which Delta will be receiving as a function of purchasing Northwest Airlines.
This kind of competition is not want any legacy carriers on this route want. Delta is operating with relatively low labor costs, new aircraft that are the most efficient available for long haul routes and they have a new network (from their merger with Northwest Airlines) that will feed the aircraft to capacity loads. If Delta does launch this service, look for United Airlines to withdraw from the market. They are the airline that lacks both the service product and fresh aircraft to compete.
Filed under: Airline News, Airline Service by ajax
No Comments »
November 4, 2008 on 11:17 am | In Airline News | No Comments
USA Today’s Today In The Sky Blog is reporting this morning that Delta CEO Richard Anderson and Delta President Ed Bastian have been rewarded handsomely for achieving the Delta / Northwest Merger. Anderson will receive more than $13 Million in stock awards and Bastian receives just over $5 Million in stock awards. Both men aren’t fully vested in the compensation until 2011.
While I think it appropriate to compensate two men who obviously worked very hard at making this merger happen, I do think this news comes out at the wrong time and I do think the reward is perhaps premature. The unions involved in this merger, particularly the IAM, will no doubt bristle at this news despite the fact that Delta / Northwest employees will be receiving stock in the new company. About 5% for the pilots and 4% for most other employees.
It would have been better to tie this award to milestones for achieving all of the merger. First, award some percentage, perhaps 50%, for bringing the two companies under one corporate structure. Second, set milestones based on the full integration of the company such as pilot seniority lists being fully merged, flight attendant senior lists merged, both sides of the company operating under the same certificate, etc. There isn’t anything wrong with rewarding accomplishments but I feel this job is only half done at best and there should be some strong incentives to complete the work before granting the prize.
Filed under: Airline News by ajax
No Comments »
November 1, 2008 on 12:22 pm | In Airline News, Airline Service, Death Watch | 2 Comments
The Milwaukee Business Journal is reporting a quote from a pilot at Midwest Airlines that the Boeing 717 Fleet may be completely phased out in 2009. The speculation is that all of the existing routes will be flown using Embaer 170 aircraft leased from Republic Airlines.
On the surface, this seems bad. In reality, I see a gleam of hope for Midwest. The Embraer 170 seats almost as many people as the 717 but cost much less to operate and its pilots are paid less as well. It’s actually a comfortable aircraft to fly and it would quite possibly allow Midwest to fly profitably the remaining routes it has.
Fans of Midwest Airlines’ Signature Service will no doubt be upset about losing access to that hallmark service but the reality is that it isn’t profitable and was probably retained way too long.
I continue to wonder what Midwest Airlines wants to be in the future. A small regional airline with no real connections to any other airline? That really doesn’t strike me as a recipe for financial success. They do have connections to Northwest Airlines (Delta) but I firmly do not see them becoming a “feeder” or “connection” airline for them. Delta / Northwest simply have too many successful regional airlines already under their umbrella and, in fact, Ed Bastian, President of Delta, has already said that Delta expects to pare down the number of regional airlines serving Delta.
While I do think Midwest Airlines can make some money flying the E-170, I still don’t think they have a viable long term strategy for success. They stay on the death watch for now.
Filed under: Airline News, Airline Service, Death Watch by ajax
2 Comments »
October 31, 2008 on 10:02 am | In Airline Fleets, Airline News, Airline Service | No Comments
Delta / Northwest is not only big with respect to the number and type of airplanes they have, they are also big for the number of hubs they are currently operating. Conventional wisdom continues to bet that some of those hubs will be closed or rationalized just as it bets that the airline fleet will be reduced.
My guess is that there really won’t be a reduction in hubs of any real significance with the exception of two. This new airline has two hubs in close proximity, Memphis and Covington/Cincinatti, and each serves similar markets. However, rather than being combined into one, I suspect that Memphis will likely be de-emphasized into a “focus” city with more connecting traffic routed through Covington/Cincinatti. The yields in each city are very good but Covington/Cincinatti is by far the city with the best yields. Memphis is likely to remain as a focus city because it is a good gateway to the central midwest section of the US.
All other hubs in the US such as Atlanta, Minneapolis / St. Paul, Detroit, and Salt Lake City have the airline as a dominant carrier and there is no reason to combine any of them with respect to the routes they serve.
Now, both airlines operate significant flights from gateway cities such as Los Angeles and New York and it is quite likely that the airline will work hard to combine some flights going to the same cities. For instance, flights from the New York area going to the same destinations in Europe will be combined to raise the load factors on the equipment being used. However, Europe presents an interesting problem because Northwest has been in a close relationship with KLM and has used Amsterdam as a “hub” to connect to other cities in Europe. Delta, on the other hand, is used to flying direct flights to a variety of cities in Europe without a hub or close partner. I suspect the relationship with KLM will be reduced so that Delta can raise the loads on its own flights to smaller European cities.
Northwest comes to the table with a hub in Tokyo, Japan and they have 5th Freedom Rights to pickup and carry traffic from Tokyo to other cities in Asia. On the surface, that would appear to be a very valuable asset. However, the value of that arrangement was far greater when the political climate in Asia was much different and the range of aircraft made it more convenient to fly to a central hub. Today, it can be much more profitable to fly direct to a variety of Asian cities using newer, long range aircraft such as the Boeing 777 and the about to be introduced 787. I have no doubt that the Tokyo hub will be retained in some form because the yields from traffic originating in Tokyo to other Asian cities is still well worth the effort but I suspect that there will be a renewed emphasis on point to point flying as things evolve in the new airline.
The thing most likely to change at Delta’s hubs will be the aircraft equipment. With a wide variety of equipment to choose from, it would be unsurprising to see a shift of long haul aircraft between the hubs in order to improve yields, load factors and even to explore new routes. That will be done slowly and carefully so that Delta doesn’t have to service too many different types of aircraft at each hub. Once again, aircraft being used at various hubs to service various areas will probably be rationalized. It would be unsurprising to see A330s shifted to longer South American and African routes with B767-400’s moved to trans-atlantic routes originating in MSP and DTW.
Los Angeles will probably see a greater concentration of 747 aircraft being used on trans-Pacific flights. New York and Atlanta will probably see 777 aircraft moved in for long range, point to point flying to destinations in India, South America and even Asia.
At present, Delta has 4 different types of long range aircraft in the 747, 777, A330 and 767 with another on the the way (787). Since Delta already operates GE powered 777-200ER/LR aircraft, they’ll likely place an order for some 777-300ER aircraft and use those to replace the aging 747 aircraft. That will reduce flying by one type. The A330 aircraft will be retained until a fleet of 787-9/10 aircraft can be purchased and then the A330 will likely be let go. Delta’s 767-400 aircraft is fairly new but it will probably suffer the same fate as the A330 in being replaced by 787 aircraft in the future. Suddenly, two basic types with 2 sub-types between them can service all the long haul routes and, at the same time, offer some harmony at each hub.
I do wonder if Northwest’s 787 orders will be switched from Rolls Royce engines to GE GEnx engines. That would permit Delta to operate two basic aircraft types that would use the same brand of engine and engines that share some basic design philosophy as well.
The tricky part of managing all of these hubs for Delta will be the domestic fleet which is comprised of Airbus A320 series, Boeing 737 series, DC-9 series and MD80/90 series aircraft. Because it is more efficient to perform maintenance on a domestic fleet that keeps the aircraft close to a maintenance center, I do wonder which hubs will get which aircraft. Both Airbus and Boeing offer good choices for domestic fleets in the A320 and 737 series. The DC-9 fleet is old and will be retired over the next couple of years so it isn’t a factor. The MD-80/90 aircraft isn’t exactly old but it does become somewhat of an orphan and they don’t offer the fuel effiency that the A320 and 737 offer. It’s quite possible that Delta will retain both the A320 and 737 series and simply order more of both until they can choose a next generation domestic fleet type from Boeing or Airbus. I do believe that the MD80/90 fleet will be selected for retirement in the next 2 years.
The exciting part of this merger will be watching the decisions that Delta makes about its new future.
Filed under: Airline Fleets, Airline News, Airline Service by ajax
No Comments »
October 29, 2008 on 4:43 pm | In Airline News | 2 Comments
The US Justice Department approved the merger between Delta Airlines and Northwest Airlines today. The two companies will now begin to work on executing the combination as quickly as possible and it should culminate with a combined operating certificate in 1 to 2 years.
In the meantime, Delta and Northwest have already made a great deal of progress towards completing the merger. The executive team has been selected, agreements with pilots have been obtained and each company has been working pretty hard towards merging the culture of each airline together. While no doubt there are bumps in the road still to be encountered, this particular merger shows great signs of being accomplished with relatively little strife.
Flight Attendants are targeted for being a trouble area. Delta’s flight attendants are non-union and while there have been a few votes over the years to unionize, all have failed pretty soundly. Northwest’s flight attendants are unionized and have been characterized as even miitant. Delta’s CEO, Richard Anderson, has urged that everyone work together and while his stated preference is for no further unionization (and he has backed that up by being very willing to negotiate differences), he also has said that he and the rest of the executive team will abide by whatever vote there is. It is likely that the flight attendants will have a vote after the merger is officially executed and it is likely that it will be in favor of unionization since a combination of Northwest’s flight attendants with the minority of Delta flight attendants in favor of a union would win any vote.
While both CEOs of each airline have professed that such a diverse fleet of aircraft will permit them to “right size” aircraft to a particular route, it is highly likely that the fleet will be pared down over time. Northwest’s youngest aircraft are manufactured by Airbus and Delta’s fleet is comprised entirely of Boeing products. Certainly both major aircraft manufacturers will see an opportunity with this merger and both will be pitching their mainstay aircraft lines, the Airbus A320 series and the Boeing 737 series. With an gentleman’s agreement in place between Delta and Boeing that gives Delta preferential delivery slots, this is Boeing’s opportunity to lose.
A good guess is that, initially, the Douglas DC-9 fleet will continue to be eliminated and bases for the Airbus A320 and Boeing 737 fleets will be established at selected hubs. It is possible that the Airbus A330 fleet will be phased out in favor of more Boeing products such as the new 787 of which Northwest already has a significant order on. The 747 fleet will most likely be phased out over time in favor of the 777-300 and which Delta already owns in the 200ER/LR version.
The combination of these two airlines will form the world’s largest airline both by revenue and traffic. This will even dwarf American Airlines by a significant degree. However, because of industry contraction and the obvious economies and advantages to be gained by constraining capacity in markets that the new Delta will be dominant in, it is likely that the airline will actually contract both its fleet and, to some degree, its employees. However, major layoffs of any significant numbers are very unlikely and most contraction is likely to be done through natural attrition.
Filed under: Airline News by ajax
2 Comments »
September 25, 2008 on 10:32 am | In Airline Fleets, Airline News | No Comments
Northwest Airlines shareholders approved their merger deal with Delta Airlines this morning. Delta shareholders meet to approve the merger this afternoon.
While this is for most purposes a pro forma part of the process, it is another step forward in this merger.
What I continue to wonder about is the new corporate identity. Will Northwest’s heritage and history survive in some small way? I’ve seen some concepts done by people that turn the Delta “widget” into point on a compass. PlaneBuzz has some images that show it looking something like THIS.
And I must say I like the concepts. I do think the circle on the fuselage is a bit busy but it works on the tail just fine. I suspect, however, that the Delta identity will remain the same and Northwest’s identity will fade away as airplanes and uniforms are changed over.
Filed under: Airline Fleets, Airline News by ajax
No Comments »
August 30, 2008 on 12:27 pm | In Airline News | 1 Comment
A number of airlines have been asking for permission to delay the start of flights to China from the United States. The Dallas Morning News reported that American Airlines now has filed for such permission on their Chicago-Beijing route authority. Both US Airways and United Airlines have also asked for the same thing on their recent route authorities.
US Airways lacks the aircraft type for making the trip from Philadelphia and United Airlines, who does have the equipment, simply doesn’t want to fly to their new destination in the current economic climate. These kind of routes cost a tremendous amount of money to operate and without some certainty that they’ll make money, the risk doesn’t seem worth it right now. To the winners of these authorities at least.
The airline industry has played the “save us” card on these routes by making the argument that just because their economic situation changed, they should be given a second or third chance to find a more convenient time to operate these routes. Yes, the entire industry has experienced a lot of challenges and, yes, the cost of fuel is certainly the biggest.
However, we are not without other airlines who I suspect would be happy to operate these routes. Why wait for an airline to decide its ready to fly them when we can identify other airlines that are willing to fly them right now. I suspect that both Delta and Continental Airlines would give serious consideration to even removing equipment from a different route in order to be able to fly these routes. Northwest, who already operates a large number of Asian routes, might well be tickled to death to offer more service.
It is time to go back to a “use it or lose it” model. Giving airlines 2nd and 3rd chances only removes the incentive to figure out how to operate in today’s climate. An airline should have no more than 12 months to operate a route authority from the date it is awarded. If it cannot or will not, then its time to seek other “bids” for these routes. When you deny such routes to Delta (who asked for ATL-Beijing) and give the to American Airlines (who wanted DFW-Beijing but ultimately asked for and got Chicago-Beijing) who then asks to defer their operation, you are putting Delta at a competitive disadvantage and American Airlines gains.
Let the airlines who can and will operate these routes, have the routes. Don’t permit large legacy airlines operating in fear the opportunity to “sit” on the routes and prevent that economic growth to someone else.
Filed under: Airline News by ajax
1 Comment »
August 22, 2008 on 9:26 pm | In Airline News, Death Watch | No Comments
The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel (newspaper of my birthplace), has this report on Midwest Airlines being late in paying over $1million in gate fees. Midwest is on my death watch list and this news doesn’t improve their standing at all. The story mentions that they are contemplating bankruptcy and I should mention that because of changes in the US bankruptcy law, bankruptcy isn’t an easy choice to make anymore. Those changes in the law are, in part, what drove both Northwest Airlines and Delta Airlines to file bankruptcy in September 2005 on the same day.
Updates to the bankruptcy code now make it more difficult for an airline to file bankruptcy, continue flying and weather debt and fare wars. Until October of 2005, most airlines used chapter 11 bankruptcy to essentially buy time when competitive pressures put them at a severe disadvantage. However, Midwest has likely been weighing the chances of obtaining DIP financing (Debtor in Possession) and given their high labor costs, vastly reduced network and fleet, most would not view this as a healthy choice for investment. In addition to high labor costs, the airline is headquartered and based in Milwaukee, a city known for strong union influence.
Northwest’s 47% stake in Midwest also makes the airline an unattractive target for a merger to other airlines. It is possible that Northwest will be ordered to divest itself of its holdings as a condition of approving its merger with Delta but it is not in their interest to do so one day earlier than mandated. By holding onto Midwest, they make Milwaukee a kind of “fortress airport” that rebuffs other airlines attempts to enter the market such as Airtran.
If Midwest were to go into bankruptcy, it would be very difficult for them to make a case for proceeding alone. They would have to look for a buyer and while Airtran could be interested, they have already begun to establish Milwaukee as a focus city and other than some assets (namely the B717 aircraft), I’m not sure what else they have to gain by buying Midwest now.
To survive, Midwest Airlines would have to enter into Chapter 11, break its labor agreements and obtain enough financing to purchase new (to them) long range aircraft that would support its original network all the while fighting off Northwest, Airtran and any other airline that smells blood. That’s a tall order for any management team in this industry.
Filed under: Airline News, Death Watch by ajax
No Comments »
|
|
|