Making it personal.
The APFA and its leader, Laura Glading, are pointing at greed on the part of American Airlines CEO Tom Horton for the reason a standalone exit from bankruptcy is being pursued. I generally find the APFA to be a bit over the top and militant in their communications and they tend to follow the model of making it personal with company executives.
But even a militant organization finds a valid argument now and then. Past CEOs of airlines exiting bankruptcy have seen huge rewards from the stock they hold. Both Doug Steenland and Glenn Tilton received tens of millions of dollars. So has Delta CEO Richard Anderson. It’s a lucrative position to be in.
APFA aren’t wrong that its to the benefit of Tom Horton and his executive team to see that kind of exit. The market valuation of AA is liable to raise their rewards dramatically. It might not be “greed” but there is a huge financial incentive.
And I do think that kind of financial rewards clouds the thinking of such teams when it comes to finding an appropriate exit from bankruptcy that BENEFITS SHAREHOLDERS.

“The market valuation of AA is liable to raise their rewards dramatically. It might not be “greed” but there is a huge financial incentive. “
Riiight… The difference between “huge financial incentive” and “greed” is a very, very fine one… In this case, I believe the difference is merely a matter of semantics.
-R
AA Must Die
I tend to agree. In the case of airline CEOs, everyone wants to get “theirs” these days. Traditionally, airlines pay CEOs very low salaries. That’s been changing for the past 5 years, I’ve noticed, with no noticeable improvement in airline profitability.