Is the A380 succeeding?
With the announcement of Asiana Airlines purchasing (6) Airbus A380 aircraft, I began to wonder about the success of this aircraft as a whole. So far, it appears that Boeing was right about the demand for very large aircraft although it lost all of that demand (practically speaking) upon the arrival of the A380. My biggest concern about this program is the airlines it is dependent upon.
Just one airline, Emirates, is responsible for 37% of the A380 orders and just one region, the Middle East is responsible for 44 % of all the A380 orders. That is a stunning amount of eggs in one basket for a region that is volatile and largely dependent on wealth generated from one commodity. Think about that, roughly 1 of 3 A380 orders comes from a small handful of airlines who are based in a tiny area that is highly interdependent.
The next largest region responsible for orders, Oceania/India/Southwest Asia, is responsible for 23% of A380 orders with most of those placed by two airlines: QANTAS and Singapore Airlines. Now, I would bet on those two airlines. QANTAS because of their rather unique position in their markets and Singapore because of their ability, day in and day out, to fill their aircraft. But the remaining orders from airlines in that area such as Malaysia Airlines, Thai Airlines and Kingfisher, are suspect at best. I question their ability to use and fill those aircraft regularly and I wonder if some of those orders won’t ultimately be converted to A350 orders with deliveries farther into the future.
Europe accounts for about 20% of the orders and almost all of those airlines do possess the ability to use the aircraft based on their current business. However, their traffic is being impacted more and more by those Middle East airlines who’ve also bought the A380 but who also enjoy dramatically lower costs. In addition, at least two of those airlines were, at least in part, driven to make their orders by their political leaders in Germany and France. Any political influence in orders for such an aircraft bring some risk into the picture. Ultimately, those airlines have to earn a profit from those very expensive assets and filling 500 seats daily is a difficult thing to do day in and day out.
The only region with orders that seem credible is the Far East (China, Korea, etc). Those locations have the numbers to fill those aircraft and their orders are small and cautious, not big and grandiose, at 9% of all A380 orders.
Is it a success? Well, when your order book is so heavily depedent one so few, it doesn’t speak well of your ability to drive future orders and ultimately have a program that at least breaks even. Do you really believe that the Middle East and, in particular, Emirates, can continue to drive that order book up to the point that Airbus can earn a profit? I don’t. I also don’t think Europe or the Far East can do it either. In the case of the former, routes are fracturing into ever more longer and thinner routes. In the case of the latter, the number of people who can travel is very dependent upon what are, in some cases, still 3rd world economies.
So, no, the A380 isn’t succeeding financially and it isn’t likely to succeed financially. 40 years ago, a vanity project could be tolerated but if Airbus was run as a real business, this is a program that would be getting the axe, not promoted by the likes of John Leahy.
Airline A380 Orders
| Emirates | 37.50% |
| Middle East | 43.75% |
| Europe | 19.58% |
| Far East | 8.75% |
| India/Oceania/SE Asia | 23.33% |

I was watching the C Series first flight and wondered when the next first flight of a (brand new) 100+ seat airliner will be? With the 737 MAX, 787, A350, A380, and A320neo series, the Big 2 have the sky pretty much 100% covered. Unless, of course, Boeing wants to take a run at the A380. This would be the second piece of the Yellowstone project, but I don’t know if the demand is there. Neither company will work on a narrowbody for several years. It might be awhile before we see another first flight, and that’s too bad.
I predict that Boeing will not only not make a run at the A380, it will be discontinuing the 747-8i in the near future. The 777-9X will be its largest aircraft. But it’s not at the top end that I wonder about Boeing (or Airbus).
It’s at the bottom end where there are thousands of aircraft to be sold and both aircraft manufacturers seem to just walk away from the market.
Just wanted to thank the Author and the respondants. Found the article extremely interesting as I am very concerned about Boeing since I’m American. I would like to think that Boeing’s gamble with the 777, Dreamliner and 747-800 will pay off in spades. Once again thanks so much for Your information!
New aircraft take decades to build out and return investment. The A380’s best feature is that it BIG. Only big market airports have enough people to fill a flight. If you want to fly from Denver to Tokyo, you can fly on a 787 direct, or stop in L.A. reboard a cattle-car 380 to get the rest of the way.
The 380 is so big that it requires specially designed jetways, it can’t slip into any gate that the other aircraft use. This is why the 380 sales are concentrated with a few airlines and locations.
I believe the A380 will be massive success. At the moment, the only way for some of the big cities to have any growth is through and increase in the size of the aircraft coming to land and take off. The number of slots will not increase. So I see bigger orders for bigger planes in the future. To argue the point about point to point travel versus using a hub. Which flight will be cheaper. Travelers will look at which one will cost them less for the flight, rather than we are in a flight with 500 people and we have to change a flight to get to our destination.
I just traveled from Paris on an a380 (Air France). If the aircraft does not succeed, I believe one of the reasons will be the manner in which some airlines are having them configured. Air France has demonstrated a preference for high density packaging, in anything less than First Class. This also includes a less than ideal number of restrooms. Finally, the craft does require special handling at the gate, in particular upon arrival (in our case, JFK). Ironically, I found a 320, which I flew to San Francisco, to be a more pleasant experience (Virgin America).
My guess is that the medium, multi aisle craft: 777, 787, 350, will be more attractive in the long run. While they do not have the major hub, high density lure of the 380, and upcoming iterations of the 747, they will attract passengers and be able to serve many venues.