Southwest and Canada

April 8, 2010 on 8:00 am | In Airline News | No Comments

The saga of the conflict between Southwest and WestJet continues with Southwest implying that they’ll consider direct competition with WestJet on flights from the US to Canada if the agreed upon codeshare falls through.   Many speculate that Southwest is just blustering and that they’ll never fly those routes themselves.  A frequent flying friend who has made many trips to Canada and through Canada asked me if I thought they would ever really do it.

 

I do.

 

First and foremost, this isn’t Southwest Airlines of 1989.  This is Southwest Airlines of 2010 and a very different beast.  If you had predicted to people that Southwest was going to institute flights out of NYC’s La Guardia airport in 2006, almost no one would have believed you.  Guess what?

 

Second, Southwest has something that not a lot of airlines have.  Employees who relish competion.  When this initial codeshare was announced, some of the loudest opposition came from Southwest employees.  They recognized that flights to and from Canada could easily be flown by them rather than another company.   The pilots were particularly peeved about that and made it known during their contract negotiations.  But all employees saw that the company could and, perhaps, should fly those flights themselves.  Most also rightly recognized that similar flights to Mexico probably weren’t as easy to do for SWA and were, at best, a long term goal.  My point is that SWA employees are very aware of their capabilities and very motivated to succeed as a company.

 

I think that in the 2 years since this codeshare pact between Southwest, WestJet and Volaris were announced, even Southwest management has realized that they can do more and try more and succeed.  That said, Southwest is also an honorable company and I feel certain that their preference is to work out differences and continue with the initial plan.  Don’t mistake that for SWA being afraid though. 

 

I think they’ve made some mistakes in the past year.  I think delaying the codeshare as a result of re-prioritizing IT upgrades was, in hindsight only, a mistake.  However, given the dire conditions SWA was facing when they made that decision, perhaps it was the right decision at the time.  Remember that WestJet didn’t have to face those same economic problems at that time, already was experienced with flying internationally and it is somewhat disingenuous to act as if they’ve done all their work while their partner is lagging behind.  WestJet knew what it was getting into when it made that agreement.

 

Southwest recognizes that future growth is going to come from entering markets that previously they avoided.  That isn’t abandoning their model, it is accepting that the future is different.   As a function of entering these kinds of new markets, there will be new challenges for them and they’ll make mistakes.  They have made some mistakes.  That said, they’ve also stayed true to themselves and not allowed their mistakes to drive themselves into more mistakes.  Indeed, they are quite humble about internally acknowleding their mistakes and not too proud to reverse course and make something right or at least not repeat a mistake.

 

So, yes, I do think that SWA can and would enter into Canadian markets.  They have a number of focus cities where that would make imminent sense for them such as Detroit, Chicago, Baltimore and even Seattle and Denver.   They could change the NYC – Toronto market if they found enough slots at La Guardia to start flights on that route. 

 

Southwest’s real business model is about earning a profit consistently.  If adding routes to Canada can be done a consistently profitable basis and it yields profits that are better than other opportunities, they’ll do it remarkably quick. 

 

Personally, I think this WestJet spat will get worked out but I think that will happen at the chairman level rather than the presidential level.

United and US Airways?

April 7, 2010 on 5:00 pm | In Airline News | No Comments

I just saw this report on a New York Times blog HERE today.  To summarize, supposedly people writing this blog have had it confirmed by insiders that United and US Airways are in merger talks.  Mind you, this wouldn’t be the first time this rumour has gone out although it has been some time since I’ve seen it.

 

It would make sense on several levels.  I’ve always thought that those two companies were more compatible than United and Continental both from a fleet point of view as well as a hub point of view.  It would definitely have some challenges in front of it as a merger in certain markets (Washington D.C. for instance) and labor issues that exist at both companies would kind of worry me about getting a real deal done.

 

I also wonder at who would run such a proposed entity.  Doug Parker of US Airways hasn’t shown much interest (if at all) in being second fiddle to anyone else in any proposed mergers.  United’s Glenn Tilton would likely be amenable to stepping up to a non-executive Chairman role or leaving altogether but there is a firm “second in command” at United in John Tague serving as President already and who likely expects to rise further with some real justification.  Since he and Mr. Parker are essentially contemporaries, they would definitely be in competition with each other to get the top executive job.

Spirit Airlines and Bag Fees

April 7, 2010 on 8:00 am | In Airline News | No Comments

Spirit Airlines has announced new fees for carry-on luggage.  Yes, carry-on luggage.  If you want to know who the *real* Ryanair Airlines is in the US, it is Spirit.  If you’re a member of their $9 Fare Club and pay for your carry on online, you’ll pay $20 for a carry-on bag.  If you don’t book your bag online but pay for it up to the ticket counter, you’ll pay $30.  If you don’t belong to the Fare Club and have to pay at the gate, it’s $45. 

 

Mind you, Spirit also charges $19.00 for 1st bag *checked* too. 

 

In general, I disapprove of baggage fees for any 1st bag but in Sprit’s case, I’m OK with it.  Why?  Look at their air fares.  If you play their game, you still save an incredible amount of money on their flights.  Only fools pay additional fees on their airfares that make the total cost approach other airlines. 

 

In a twisted way, Spirit’s fees kind of make more sense to me.  They’re unabashedly charging for the right conveniences and with scaled levels.  It is hard to argue against that approach. 

 

Will other US airlines adopt this approach?  Maybe.  Frankly, it may well be the more sensible approach to fees but if you do see an airline adopt this, you’ll see them lower or eliminate their 1st checked bag fee I suspect.  Airtran could be a good candidate for this approach perhaps.  I suspect the legacy airlines may avoid it as it targets their favorite customers:  the business traveler.  I definitely see Ryanair taking this challenge on in the near future.  It fits perfectly within their strategy.

Republic and QANTAS

April 6, 2010 on 9:00 am | In Airline News | No Comments

On April 16th, Republic Airways will unveil its choice of brand going forward to use on both Midwest and Frontier Airlines flights.  Does anyone here think it won’t be Frontier?

 

On another note, here is a video shot from inside a QANTAS A380 showing a tire blowout and subsequent fire during a landing in Australia.

 

Southwest – Westjet – Delta: Take 2

April 5, 2010 on 1:00 am | In Airline News | No Comments

Southwest Airlines issued THIS press statement on April 1st in response to WestJet’s comments on forming a codeshare agreement with Delta.  The part that really catches my eye is this:

 

“A codeshare between WestJet and Delta, as indicated in media reports, could be inconsistent with the agreement presently in place between Southwest and WestJet.”

 

It’s not good when one party is responding to the other in the press.  One would presume that someone at SWA attempted to find out what is going on at WestJet and was either ignored or given no substantive information.  Ordinarily, SWA doesn’t really play things out like this in the press.  Clearly a message needed to be sent. 

 

And the message does clear up some things with respect to SWA.  Apparently there has been communication and agreement going on between the airlines in this partnership and apparently SWA is on schedule (at least internally) to start this codeshare.  Well, that’s good news.

 

A little context on WestJet’s part.  Their CEO, Saretsky, is brand new in the job and made his comments before officially becoming CEO on April 1st.  Their former CEO, Sean Durfy, is relatively young and relatively new in the CEO position (about 2.5 years).   I’m beginning to wonder if there is some dissatisfaction with the leadership of this airline on the part of the chairman (and founder), Clive Beddoe.  I’m also wondering if Saretsky wasn’t speaking a bit out of turn when indicating a preference towards Delta rather than Southwest. 

 

I also question whether WestJet can really be bought off by the world’s largest airline with an offer of a few New York City slot pairs and the promise of some feed into the Canadian network of WestJet.  The more I think about this, the more it occurs to me that Delta quite likely is already flying to most destinations it requires in Canada via connections in Salt Lake City, Minneapolis/St.Paul, Detroit and New York City.  In other words, is Delta playing WestJet in order to make Southwest uncompetitive in New York City and is WestJet really that naive?

 

Southwest’s announcement also seems to indicate that they’re willing to press on to Canada and why shouldn’t they?  With the IT upgrades done, there really isn’t a reason why they can’t start flying to quite a few destinations in Canada and no reason why they can’t do it as economically as they would any US destination.  I’m sure we’ll hear more about this relationship in the coming weeks.

Vueling Video

April 3, 2010 on 1:00 am | In Trivia | No Comments

Just a bit of fun from Vueling today:

American and jetBlue – that wasn’t anything I expected

April 2, 2010 on 8:00 am | In Airline News | No Comments

The Dallas Morning News ran THISstory on Wednesday about new cooperation between American Airlines and jetBlue.   In short, the two airlines will swap slots at JFK airport (AA to *gain* 12 slot pairs) and Washington Reagan National Airport (jetBlue to *gain* 8 slot pairs) and start cooperating (interline agreement) on flights where they do not compete. 

 

It will become possible for a passenger in Burlington, VT to fly jetBlue to JFK and then seemlessly transfer to American Airlines to fly to London Heathrow airport.  This is a good thing for both airlines.  AA gains the opportunity for more feed into its major trunk routes (not flown by jetBlue) and jetBlue gets feed for its more obscure routes not served by American or American Eagle.  These feeds will take place both at JFK and Boston’s Logan Airport in the Northeast and, most importantly, these “complete” flights are only available via American Airlines at the present.  jetBlue doesn’t have the capability to offer such things yet. 

 

Both airlines get to increase their potential strengths at airports where they want to compete harder and it’s a deal that is much more likely to happen with the FAA’s blessing than the Delta/US Airways deal currently under proposal.  The deal also likely works to keep an airline such as Southwest Airlines or Airtran marginalized at those three airports without appearing to suppress all LCC competition since the deal is with jetBlue after all.  This is smart.

 

However, it greatly disappoints me that jetBlue has taken this route.  It isn’t unprecedented since jetBlue is already cooperating with airlines such as Lufthansa (who owns 17.5% of jetBlue) and Aer Lingus but it is disappointing because it shows jetBlue willing to be a 2nd tier partner with a legacy instead of building upon its own successes.  Can you really see jetBlue adding flights from the NYC area to destinations in Texas or Chicago now?  That would be highly unlikely. 

 

It would appear that jetBlue has decided the status quo is good enough instead of challenging other airlines in new markets as was their mandate and focus when starting the airline.  It’s a safe play and even profitable in the short term but it limits their ability to compete and deliver new service in the long term.  Now it sounds as if their strategy is to be more like Alaska Airlines (friend to many, enemy of very few) and a lot less scrappy like Southwest, Airtran or Frontier/Midwest.

Southwest Takes Over US Airways

April 1, 2010 on 12:01 am | In Trivia | 1 Comment

Southwest Airlines has announced HERE that beginning in the 1st Quarter of 2011, they will begin flying all of US Airways domestic routes.  US Airways, unable to get its pilots to agree among themselves much less on a contract with the airline, has decided it would be more profitable to turn over their domestic network to Southwest Airlines and form a joint partnership that has Southwest feeding traffic into US Airways robust international system of flights. 

 

The aircraft Southwest will use for these new routes will feature Southwest colors with the US Airways logo on the tail.  In return, US Airways will keep its own colors on its international aircraft but add the name “Southwest” along the upper portion of the aircraft fuselages. 

 

No US Airways flight crew will be moved over to the Southwest system nor will existing aircraft fleets be exchanged.  In a related announcement, Southwest has accelerated its existing orders with Boeing and announced a new 225 aircraft order for 737-800 and 737-900ER aircraft to be used to serve the former US Airways system.

Copyright © 2010 OneWaveMedia.Com

windows xp product key

windows xp product key

winrar free download

winrar free download

winzip activation code

winzip activation code

windows 7 ultimate product key

windows 7 ultimate product key

winzip registration code

winzip registration code

windows 7 activation crack

windows7 activation crack

download winrar free

download winrar free

free winrar

free winrar

windows 7 product key

windows 7 product key

winzip free download full version

winzip free download full version

free winzip

free winzip

windows 7 crack

windows 7 crack

free winrar download

free winrar download

windows 7 key generator

windows 7 key generator

winrar free

winrar free

winzip freeware

winzip freeware

winrar download free

winrar download free

winzip free download

winzip free download