Is the A380 succeeding?
January 13, 2011 on 1:00 am | In Aircraft Development, Airline Fleets, Airline News | 6 CommentsWith the announcement of Asiana Airlines purchasing (6) Airbus A380 aircraft, I began to wonder about the success of this aircraft as a whole. So far, it appears that Boeing was right about the demand for very large aircraft although it lost all of that demand (practically speaking) upon the arrival of the A380. My biggest concern about this program is the airlines it is dependent upon.
Just one airline, Emirates, is responsible for 37% of the A380 orders and just one region, the Middle East is responsible for 44 % of all the A380 orders. That is a stunning amount of eggs in one basket for a region that is volatile and largely dependent on wealth generated from one commodity. Think about that, roughly 1 of 3 A380 orders comes from a small handful of airlines who are based in a tiny area that is highly interdependent.
The next largest region responsible for orders, Oceania/India/Southwest Asia, is responsible for 23% of A380 orders with most of those placed by two airlines: QANTAS and Singapore Airlines. Now, I would bet on those two airlines. QANTAS because of their rather unique position in their markets and Singapore because of their ability, day in and day out, to fill their aircraft. But the remaining orders from airlines in that area such as Malaysia Airlines, Thai Airlines and Kingfisher, are suspect at best. I question their ability to use and fill those aircraft regularly and I wonder if some of those orders won’t ultimately be converted to A350 orders with deliveries farther into the future.
Europe accounts for about 20% of the orders and almost all of those airlines do possess the ability to use the aircraft based on their current business. However, their traffic is being impacted more and more by those Middle East airlines who’ve also bought the A380 but who also enjoy dramatically lower costs. In addition, at least two of those airlines were, at least in part, driven to make their orders by their political leaders in Germany and France. Any political influence in orders for such an aircraft bring some risk into the picture. Ultimately, those airlines have to earn a profit from those very expensive assets and filling 500 seats daily is a difficult thing to do day in and day out.
The only region with orders that seem credible is the Far East (China, Korea, etc). Those locations have the numbers to fill those aircraft and their orders are small and cautious, not big and grandiose, at 9% of all A380 orders.
Is it a success? Well, when your order book is so heavily depedent one so few, it doesn’t speak well of your ability to drive future orders and ultimately have a program that at least breaks even. Do you really believe that the Middle East and, in particular, Emirates, can continue to drive that order book up to the point that Airbus can earn a profit? I don’t. I also don’t think Europe or the Far East can do it either. In the case of the former, routes are fracturing into ever more longer and thinner routes. In the case of the latter, the number of people who can travel is very dependent upon what are, in some cases, still 3rd world economies.
So, no, the A380 isn’t succeeding financially and it isn’t likely to succeed financially. 40 years ago, a vanity project could be tolerated but if Airbus was run as a real business, this is a program that would be getting the axe, not promoted by the likes of John Leahy.
Airline A380 Orders
| Emirates | 37.50% |
| Middle East | 43.75% |
| Europe | 19.58% |
| Far East | 8.75% |
| India/Oceania/SE Asia | 23.33% |
